Will AI agents take our jobs? An honest look
It's the first question I get, usually half-joking and half not. It deserves a straight answer, so here's mine, with the research behind it.
Myth: agents replace people
Agents replace tasks, not people. Almost every job is a bundle of tasks: some need judgment, care and creativity, and some are pure repetition. Agents are good at the second kind. In Statistics Canada's 2025 survey, nearly 90% of Canadian businesses using AI said it hadn't changed how many people they employ. What changes is how people spend their day.
Myth: new technology always means fewer jobs
History says otherwise, more often than you'd think. When ATMs spread, many expected bank tellers to vanish. Instead, as economist James Bessen has shown, teller jobs kept growing for years: cheaper branches meant more branches, and tellers moved from counting cash to helping customers. Zoom out further and the pattern is striking. MIT economist David Autor and his colleagues found that about 60% of American workers today are in occupations that didn't exist in 1940.
Myth: nothing will change
I won't pretend that either. The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025 expects 170 million jobs to be created and 92 million displaced by 2030, a net gain of 78 million, with nearly 40% of the skills people use at work changing. That's real disruption. The honest response isn't denial; it's helping people learn the tools and move toward the work that machines can't do.
A different picture
Here's how I'd rather think about it. An agent is a tireless colleague for the repetitive part of the job. It doesn't lose focus at 4:59 on a Friday, it handles the 200th invoice as carefully as the first, and it never minds the boring bits. That gives people something rare: time and attention for the work that needs a human.
Cal Newport makes a version of this case in Deep Work: the focused, demanding work that creates real value is exactly what gets crowded out by constant shallow tasks. And back in 1930, John Maynard Keynes imagined his grandchildren working a fifteen-hour week, freed by technology to focus on living well. We're not there, but for the first time, small teams can take a real step in that direction.
That's the line we hold at Everyday Agentry. We build agents to cut the backlog, not the team. People approve what matters, keep the relationships and make the decisions. Agents take the repetition, and give the hours back.
Darren
Sources
- Statistics Canada, analysis of AI use by businesses, 2025, as reported by BetaKit
- James Bessen, "Why Computers Don't Replace Workers," ITIF, 2016
- David Autor, Caroline Chin, Anna Salomons and Bryan Seegmiller, "New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2024
- World Economic Forum, Future of Jobs Report 2025
- Cal Newport, Deep Work, 2016
- John Maynard Keynes, "Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren," 1930